[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4e5aaed1-bf7d-18a8-0f77-8f29bb2e43bc@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2023 14:06:28 +1000
From: Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>
To: James Morse <james.morse@....com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev
Cc: x86@...nel.org, Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@...wei.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
jianyong.wu@....com, justin.he@....com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 12/35] ACPI: Use the acpi_device_is_present()
helper in more places
On 9/14/23 02:38, James Morse wrote:
> acpi_device_is_present() checks the present or functional bits
> from the cached copy of _STA.
>
> A few places open-code this check. Use the helper instead to
> improve readability.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/scan.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> index 691d4b7686ee..ed01e19514ef 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> @@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ static int acpi_scan_device_check(struct acpi_device *adev)
> int error;
>
> acpi_bus_get_status(adev);
> - if (adev->status.present || adev->status.functional) {
> + if (acpi_device_is_present(adev)) {
> /*
> * This function is only called for device objects for which
> * matching scan handlers exist. The only situation in which
> @@ -338,7 +338,7 @@ static int acpi_scan_bus_check(struct acpi_device *adev, void *not_used)
> int error;
>
> acpi_bus_get_status(adev);
> - if (!(adev->status.present || adev->status.functional)) {
> + if (!acpi_device_is_present(adev)) {
> acpi_scan_device_not_present(adev);
> return 0;
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists