[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230918153835.3303b94c@p-imbrenda>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2023 15:38:35 +0200
From: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>,
Jason Herne <jjherne@...ux.ibm.com>,
Harald Freudenberger <freude@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
Anish Ghulati <aghulati@...gle.com>,
Venkatesh Srinivas <venkateshs@...omium.org>,
Andrew Thornton <andrewth@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/26] KVM: s390: Stop selecting and depending on
HAVE_KVM
On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 17:31:02 -0700
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com> wrote:
> Now that nothing in s390 or architecture agnostic code consumes HAVE_KVM,
> stop selecting it in s390. This is one of several steps towards deleting
> HAVE_KVM from the common KVM Kconfig.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
> ---
> arch/s390/Kconfig | 1 -
> arch/s390/kvm/Kconfig | 1 -
> 2 files changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/Kconfig b/arch/s390/Kconfig
> index ae29e4392664..8a5dca0036d9 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/s390/Kconfig
> @@ -193,7 +193,6 @@ config S390
> select HAVE_KPROBES
> select HAVE_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE
> select HAVE_KRETPROBES
> - select HAVE_KVM
> select HAVE_LIVEPATCH
> select HAVE_MEMBLOCK_PHYS_MAP
> select HAVE_MOD_ARCH_SPECIFIC
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/Kconfig b/arch/s390/kvm/Kconfig
> index 459d536116a6..9056cee72945 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/Kconfig
> @@ -19,7 +19,6 @@ if VIRTUALIZATION
> config KVM
> def_tristate y
> prompt "Kernel-based Virtual Machine (KVM) support"
> - depends on HAVE_KVM
> select PREEMPT_NOTIFIERS
> select HAVE_KVM_CPU_RELAX_INTERCEPT
> select HAVE_KVM_VCPU_ASYNC_IOCTL
it looks like we don't use HAVE_KVM on s390x
Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists