linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6] driver core: platform: set numa_node before platform_device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0id5sAs711-oCgV7kHfJQOKBWN=JTt1wJkpx4qZqE_18Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 18 Sep 2023 16:34:02 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Jinhui Guo <guojinhui.liam@...edance.com>
Cc:     rafael@...nel.org, lenb@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        lizefan.x@...edance.com, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] driver core: platform: set numa_node before platform_device_add()

On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 3:46 PM Jinhui Guo <guojinhui.liam@...edance.com> wrote:
>
> Setting the devices' numa_node needs to be done in
> platform_device_register_full(), because that's where the
> platform device object is allocated.
>
> Fixes: 4a60406d3592 ("driver core: platform: expose numa_node to users in sysfs")
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309122309.mbxAnAIe-lkp@intel.com/
> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org>

No, I haven't given you this tag.

I don't think that Greg has given you the one above either.

Please don't add tage that you haven't received to your patches,
because they are not applicable with incorrect tags.

> Signed-off-by: Jinhui Guo <guojinhui.liam@...edance.com>
> ---
> V5 -> V6:
>   1. Update subject to correct function name platform_device_add().
>   2. Provide a more clear and accurate description of the changes
>      made in commit (suggested by Rafael J. Wysocki).
>   3. Add reviewer name.
>
> V4 -> V5:
>   Add Cc: stable line and changes from the previous submited patches.
>
> V3 -> V4:
>   Refactor code to be an ACPI function call.
>
> V2 -> V3:
>   Fix Signed-off name.
>
> V1 -> V2:
>   Fix compile error without enabling CONFIG_ACPI.
> ---
>
>  drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c | 4 +---
>  drivers/base/platform.c      | 1 +
>  include/linux/acpi.h         | 5 +++++
>  3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c
> index 48d15dd785f6..adcbfbdc343f 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c
> @@ -178,11 +178,9 @@ struct platform_device *acpi_create_platform_device(struct acpi_device *adev,
>         if (IS_ERR(pdev))
>                 dev_err(&adev->dev, "platform device creation failed: %ld\n",
>                         PTR_ERR(pdev));
> -       else {
> -               set_dev_node(&pdev->dev, acpi_get_node(adev->handle));
> +       else
>                 dev_dbg(&adev->dev, "created platform device %s\n",
>                         dev_name(&pdev->dev));
> -       }
>
>         kfree(resources);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/platform.c b/drivers/base/platform.c
> index 76bfcba25003..35c891075d95 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/platform.c
> @@ -841,6 +841,7 @@ struct platform_device *platform_device_register_full(
>                         goto err;
>         }
>
> +       set_dev_node(&pdev->dev, ACPI_NODE_GET(ACPI_COMPANION(&pdev->dev)));
>         ret = platform_device_add(pdev);
>         if (ret) {
>  err:
> diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
> index a73246c3c35e..6a349d53f19e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> @@ -477,6 +477,10 @@ static inline int acpi_get_node(acpi_handle handle)
>         return 0;
>  }
>  #endif
> +
> +#define ACPI_NODE_GET(adev) ((adev) && (adev)->handle ? \
> +       acpi_get_node((adev)->handle) : NUMA_NO_NODE)
> +
>  extern int pnpacpi_disabled;
>
>  #define PXM_INVAL      (-1)
> @@ -770,6 +774,7 @@ const char *acpi_get_subsystem_id(acpi_handle handle);
>  #define ACPI_COMPANION_SET(dev, adev)  do { } while (0)
>  #define ACPI_HANDLE(dev)               (NULL)
>  #define ACPI_HANDLE_FWNODE(fwnode)     (NULL)
> +#define ACPI_NODE_GET(adev)            NUMA_NO_NODE
>
>  #include <acpi/acpi_numa.h>
>
> --
> 2.20.1
>