lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f649285c0973ec59180ed51c4ee10cdc51279505.camel@infradead.org>
Date:   Mon, 18 Sep 2023 14:21:23 +0100
From:   David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To:     Paul Durrant <paul@....org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Paul Durrant <pdurrant@...zon.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/12] KVM: selftests / xen: don't explicitly set the
 vcpu_info address

On Mon, 2023-09-18 at 11:21 +0000, Paul Durrant wrote:
> From: Paul Durrant <pdurrant@...zon.com>
> 
> If the vCPU id is set and the shared_info is mapped using HVA then we can
> infer that KVM has the ability to use a default vcpu_info mapping. Hence
> we can stop setting the address of the vcpu_info structure.

Again that means we're not *testing* it any more when the test is run
on newer kernels. Can we perhaps set it explicitly, after *half* the
tests are done? Maybe to a *different* address than the default which
is derived from the Xen vcpu_id? And check that the memcpy works right
when we do?


Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/pkcs7-signature" (5965 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ