linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 03/10] platform/x86/intel/ifs: Image loading for new generations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <SJ1PR11MB6083A4237D928F180B6DB1E1FCFBA@SJ1PR11MB6083.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Mon, 18 Sep 2023 15:25:03 +0000
From:   "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To:     Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Joseph, Jithu" <jithu.joseph@...el.com>
CC:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        "markgross@...nel.org" <markgross@...nel.org>,
        "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
        "dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org" 
        <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
        "patches@...ts.linux.dev" <patches@...ts.linux.dev>,
        "Shankar, Ravi V" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
        "Xu, Pengfei" <pengfei.xu@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 03/10] platform/x86/intel/ifs: Image loading for new
 generations

> I think Tony's "proof" is pretty invalid. He doesn't differentiate
> HW interface related bitfields from those which are not HW interface 
> related (to the extent that in fact most of those bitfields likely are not 
> HW interface related).

When I made that comment it was about a patch series that used
bitfields to decode the subfields in Intel model specific MSRs.  I
think that's true of use in this series too.

I think most of these are for MSR decode. The one mentioned in
this thread: "union ifs_scan_hashes_status_gen2 {" definitely is.

Are there any that are not for MSRs? I'd also claim "Intel
specific" if there are some decoding parts of the Intel scan
file format.

-Tony