linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Add qcom hvc/shmem transport support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZQhysWhFtR68iVMa@brian-x1>
Date:   Mon, 18 Sep 2023 11:54:25 -0400
From:   Brian Masney <bmasney@...hat.com>
To:     Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Cc:     Nikunj Kela <quic_nkela@...cinc.com>, cristian.marussi@....com,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
        conor+dt@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org,
        konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Add qcom hvc/shmem transport support

On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 04:15:52PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 08:01:26AM -0700, Nikunj Kela wrote:
> > Gentle Ping!
> > 
> 
> I will take a look at this later this week. That said, I am unable be
> gauge the urgency based on you ping here. You have shown the same urgency
> last time for a feature that I queued promptly just to know that it was
> abandon within couple of days. So I don't want to rush here simply based
> on the number of pings here. I need to understand that it is really that
> important. For now, I am thinking of skipping even v6.7 just to allow
> some time for Qcom to make up its mind and be absolutely sure this is what
> they *really* want this time.

Hi Sudeep,

Red Hat is interested in this patch set. Qualcomm is moving one of their
automotive platforms over to use SCMI and this will appear in that
product.

Brian