[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e6433ada-16db-4d16-801b-9a3fd5460467@kernel.dk>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2023 08:00:45 -0600
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Justin Sanders <justin@...aid.com>,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, Xu Panda <xu.panda@....com.cn>,
Yang Yang <yang.yang29@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] aoe: refactor deprecated strncpy
On 9/18/23 1:03 AM, Justin Stitt wrote:
>> Change looks fine to me too, but for the love of $deity, please use
>> a proper subject line for these kinds of patches. It's not refactoring
>> anything.
>>
>
> Fair.
>
> Perhaps "xyz: replace strncpy with strscpy"?
That's a lot more descriptive, as a) it's actually accurate, and b) this
is what the patch does. You just sent another one with this refactor
wording which makes zero sense, please resend this and others targeted
at block with a proper description.
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists