[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdXQ=xpeY3tmLXe1kgJbRtmVAn62rEhvzO+VB7GCgy4F8w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2023 18:02:39 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Peter Lafreniere <peter@...jl.ca>
Cc: segher@...nel.crashing.org, anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com,
ink@...assic.park.msu.ru, jack@...e.cz, johannes@...solutions.net,
linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
linux-um@...ts.infradead.org, linux@...linux.org.uk,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, reiserfs-devel@...r.kernel.org,
richard.henderson@...aro.org, richard@....at,
tsbogend@...ha.franken.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] arch/*: config: Remove ReiserFS from defconfig
Hi Peter,
On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 5:58 PM Peter Lafreniere <peter@...jl.ca> wrote:
> 2) Stops building an obsolete and largely-unused filesystem unnecessarily.
> Some hobbyist targets like m68k and alpha may prefer to keep all filesystems
> available until total removal, but others like arm and UML have no need for
> ReiserFS to be built unless specifically configured.
As UML is used a lot for testing, isn't it actually counter-productive
to remove ReiserFS from the UML defconfig? The less testing it
receives, the higher the chance of introducing regressions.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists