[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <551475267.58816.1695140566849.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2023 18:22:46 +0200 (CEST)
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To: anton ivanov <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>
Cc: tglx <tglx@...utronix.de>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, x86 <x86@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, bp <bp@...en8.de>,
dave hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, hpa <hpa@...or.com>,
mingo <mingo@...hat.com>, juri lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
vincent guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>, mgorman@...e.de,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
jon grimm <jon.grimm@....com>, bharata@....com,
raghavendra kt <raghavendra.kt@....com>,
boris ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
konrad wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>, jgross <jgross@...e.com>,
andrew cooper3 <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
linux-m68k <linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
linux-um <linux-um@...ts.infradead.org>,
Brian Cain <bcain@...cinc.com>, linux-hexagon@...r.kernel.org,
Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@...aro.org>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>,
linux-alpha <linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Arches that don't support PREEMPT
----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: "anton ivanov" <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>
> It's been a while. I remember that I dropped it at the time, but do not remember
> the full details.
>
> There was some stuff related to FP state and a few other issues I ran into while
> rewriting the interrupt controller. Some of it may be resolved by now as we are
> using host cpu flags, etc.
I remember also having a hacky but working version almost 10 years ago.
It was horrible slow because of the extra scheduler rounds.
But yes, if PREEMPT will be a must-have feature we'll have to try again.
Thanks,
//richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists