[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZQngsfCdj0TJbEUL@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2023 07:56:01 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...hat.com,
juri.lelli@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
bristot@...hat.com, vschneid@...hat.com, ast@...nel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org, martin.lau@...nel.org,
joshdon@...gle.com, brho@...gle.com, pjt@...gle.com,
derkling@...gle.com, haoluo@...gle.com, dvernet@...a.com,
dschatzberg@...a.com, dskarlat@...cmu.edu, riel@...riel.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...a.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET v4] sched: Implement BPF extensible scheduler class
Hello, Mel.
I don't think the discussion has reached a point where the points of
disagreements are sufficiently laid out from both sides. Do you have any
further thoughts?
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists