linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: next-20230918: x86 build fails

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAP01T74oyzNvNqMq62UvfbkER906skY=wdg9PVMbRQhMOw+1UQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 19 Sep 2023 10:47:15 +0200
From:   Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>
To:     "Aithal, Srikanth" <sraithal@....com>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: next-20230918: x86 build fails

On Tue, 19 Sept 2023 at 05:55, Aithal, Srikanth <sraithal@....com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> linux-next: next-20230918: x86 build fails with below error:
>
> arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c: In function ‘arch_bpf_stack_walk’:
> arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:3022:72: error: ‘struct unwind_state’ has no
> member named ‘sp’; did you mean ‘bp’?
> 3022 |                 if (!addr || !consume_fn(cookie, (u64)addr,
> (u64)state.sp, (u64)state.bp))
> |                                                                        ^~
> |                                                                        bp
> make[4]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:243: arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.o]
> Error 1
> make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:480: arch/x86/net] Error 2
>

Hi,
Thanks for the report. This has been fixed in bpf-next and the fix
should find its way into linux-next soon.
You can locally apply the fix for now to be unstuck.

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git/commit/?id=43c6e890472edf3f667579b0a671f4b3d9b2fa3d

>
>
> Thanks,
> Srikanth Aithal