[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230919085612.gdmpze6c6stvammg@bogus>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2023 09:56:12 +0100
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: Brian Masney <bmasney@...hat.com>
Cc: Nikunj Kela <quic_nkela@...cinc.com>, cristian.marussi@....com,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
andersson@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Add qcom hvc/shmem transport support
On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 11:54:25AM -0400, Brian Masney wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 04:15:52PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 08:01:26AM -0700, Nikunj Kela wrote:
> > > Gentle Ping!
> > >
> >
> > I will take a look at this later this week. That said, I am unable be
> > gauge the urgency based on you ping here. You have shown the same urgency
> > last time for a feature that I queued promptly just to know that it was
> > abandon within couple of days. So I don't want to rush here simply based
> > on the number of pings here. I need to understand that it is really that
> > important. For now, I am thinking of skipping even v6.7 just to allow
> > some time for Qcom to make up its mind and be absolutely sure this is what
> > they *really* want this time.
>
> Hi Sudeep,
>
> Red Hat is interested in this patch set. Qualcomm is moving one of their
> automotive platforms over to use SCMI and this will appear in that
> product.
>
Thanks Brian, I trust Redhat over Qcom 😄. I will try to review and enable
progress later this week. We can try to target next merge window.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
Powered by blists - more mailing lists