lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 19 Sep 2023 11:26:09 +0200
From:   AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To:     Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
Cc:     Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@...iatek.com>,
        linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Laura Nao <laura.nao@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: mediatek: Detect single/multi core SCP with
 rpmsg-name property

Il 19/09/23 07:03, Chen-Yu Tsai ha scritto:
> In the just landed multi-core SCP work, detection of single/multi core
> SCP is done by checking the immediate child node of the SCP complex
> device node. In the original work this was done by matching the child
> node's name. However the name wasn't previously standardized. This
> resulted in breakage on MT8183 and MT8192 Chromebooks while the driver
> side changes were picked up and the device tree changes were not picked
> up.
> 
> Instead, match against the "mediatek,rpmsg-name" property, which is
> required to be present in the rpmsg sub-node. This makes the
> aforementioned devices running old device trees working again.
> 
> Reported-by: Laura Nao <laura.nao@...labora.com>
> Fixes: 1fdbf0cdde98 ("remoteproc: mediatek: Probe SCP cluster on multi-core SCP")
> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>
> ---
> The patch is based on next-20230918 with a whole bunch of local patches
> stacked on top. None of my local patches are related to remoteproc, so
> it should be fine.
> 
> I tested on both MT8183 Juniper and MT8192 Hayato and on both systems
> the SCP successfully probed again.

Instead of checking "mediatek,rpmsg-name", I think that a better way of checking if
this is single or multi core is to count the number of cores...

I've sent my own version of this, please check [1].

[1]: 
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-remoteproc/20230919092336.51007-1-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com/

Cheers,
Angelo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ