linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFT 1/2] i2c: rcar: reset controller is mandatory for Gen3+

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMuHMdVL1U=yFdRA6diav8f9DTHPunesvPk1VxxWeaM+9KhjJA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 19 Sep 2023 11:27:04 +0200
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFT 1/2] i2c: rcar: reset controller is mandatory for Gen3+

Hi Wolfram,

On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 11:19 AM Wolfram Sang
<wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com> wrote:
> > > +               ret = reset_control_status(priv->rstc);
> > > +               if (ret < 0)
> > > +                       return ret;
> >
> > This is a pre-existing check, but do you really need it?
> > This condition will be true if the reset is still asserted, which
> > could happen due to some glitch, or force-booting into a new kernel
> > using kexec.  And AFAIUI, that should be resolved by the call to
> > rcar_i2c_do_reset() above.
>
> This check is needed to ensure reset_control_status() really works
> because we need it in rcar_i2c_do_reset(). From the docs:
>
> "reset_control_status - returns a negative errno if not supported,..."
>
> The code only checks for that, not for the status of the reset line.

Right, I missed the negative.
I don't think this can fail on R-Car Gen2+ (using the CPG/MSSR driver)
if devm_reset_control_get_exclusive() succeeded, but it's prudent, in
case the block is every reused on a different SoC family.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds