[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZQl1zwVkx9n2MPvr@shikoro>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2023 12:19:59 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc: Jan Bottorff <janb@...amperecomputing.com>,
Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
Yann Sionneau <yann@...nneau.net>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Jan Dabros <jsd@...ihalf.com>,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Yann Sionneau <ysionneau@...rayinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: designware: Fix corrupted memory seen in the ISR
> I also agree that a wmb() in the i2c driver is not the more elegant fix.
> For similar reasons, we hid barriers in the write*() macros, drivers
> need to stay architecture-agnostic as much as possible.
Exactly my thinking. I wanted to read this patch discussion later this
week. But from glimpsing at it so far, I already wondered why there
isn't a memory barrier in the final accessor to the register.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists