lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 19 Sep 2023 09:59:54 +0800
From:   Tengfei Fan <quic_tengfan@...cinc.com>
To:     Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, <agross@...nel.org>,
        <andersson@...nel.org>, <djakov@...nel.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>
CC:     <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <quic_tsoni@...cinc.com>, <quic_shashim@...cinc.com>,
        <quic_kaushalk@...cinc.com>, <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>,
        <quic_tingweiz@...cinc.com>, <quic_aiquny@...cinc.com>,
        <kernel@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] interconnect: qcom: Add SM4450 interconnect
 provider driver



在 9/15/2023 8:43 PM, Konrad Dybcio 写道:
> On 15.09.2023 04:01, Tengfei Fan wrote:
>> Add driver for the Qualcomm interconnect buses found in SM4450 based
>> platforms. The topology consists of several NoCs that are controlled
>> by a remote processor that collects the aggregated bandwidth for each
>> master-slave pairs.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tengfei Fan <quic_tengfan@...cinc.com>
>> ---
> [...]
> 
>> +static struct qcom_icc_bcm bcm_acv_disp = {
>> +	.name = "ACV",
>> +	.num_nodes = 1,
>> +	.nodes = { &ebi_disp },
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct qcom_icc_bcm bcm_mc0_disp = {
>> +	.name = "MC0",
>> +	.num_nodes = 1,
>> +	.nodes = { &ebi_disp },
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct qcom_icc_bcm bcm_mm0_disp = {
>> +	.name = "MM0",
>> +	.num_nodes = 1,
>> +	.nodes = { &qns_mem_noc_hf_disp },
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct qcom_icc_bcm bcm_sh0_disp = {
>> +	.name = "SH0",
>> +	.num_nodes = 1,
>> +	.nodes = { &qns_llcc_disp },
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct qcom_icc_bcm bcm_sh1_disp = {
>> +	.name = "SH1",
>> +	.num_nodes = 1,
>> +	.nodes = { &qnm_pcie_disp },
>> +};
> """
> v1 -> v2:
>    - remove DISP related paths
> """
> 
> you sure?
> 
> + I still see _disp nodes..
> 
> Konrad

Hi Konrad,
only removed SLAVE_MNOC_HF_MEM_NOC_DISP related code actually as V1 comment.

-- 
Thx and BRs,
Tengfei Fan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ