lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 19 Sep 2023 14:34:01 +0200
From:   Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
To:     "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the vfs-brauner tree

On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 01:52:06PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 09:39:53AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > The following commit is also in the iomap tree as a different commit
> > (but the same patch):
> > 
> >   de5b0b257ee3 ("iomap: handle error conditions more gracefully in iomap_to_bh")
> > 
> > This is commit
> > 
> >   4aa8cdd5e523 ("iomap: handle error conditions more gracefully in iomap_to_bh")
> > 
> > in the iomap tree.
> 
> Christian, do you want to push this to Linus instead of me?  I've a
> couple more fixes that I'm about to send out to fsdevel and could just
> roll all the iomap stuff into a single branch... but if you were about
> to this to Linus I don't mind letting that happen.

So I was about to send a pull request tomorrow. I thought I was supposed
to pick up iomap stuff. Let me know what you prefer. I can easily drop
this patch. :)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ