[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230919124703.hj2bvqeogfhv36qy@skbuf>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2023 15:47:03 +0300
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
To: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...nel.org>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, horms@...nel.org, s-vadapalli@...com,
srk@...com, vigneshr@...com, p-varis@...com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rogerq@...nel.rog
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw: add mqprio qdisc
offload in channel mode
Hi Roger,
On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 10:53:58AM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
> -int am65_cpsw_qos_ndo_setup_tc(struct net_device *ndev, enum tc_setup_type type,
> - void *type_data)
> -{
> - switch (type) {
> - case TC_QUERY_CAPS:
> - return am65_cpsw_tc_query_caps(ndev, type_data);
> - case TC_SETUP_QDISC_TAPRIO:
> - return am65_cpsw_setup_taprio(ndev, type_data);
> - case TC_SETUP_BLOCK:
> - return am65_cpsw_qos_setup_tc_block(ndev, type_data);
> - default:
> - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> - }
> -}
> -
> -void am65_cpsw_qos_link_up(struct net_device *ndev, int link_speed)
> -{
> - struct am65_cpsw_port *port = am65_ndev_to_port(ndev);
> -
> - if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TI_AM65_CPSW_TAS))
> - return;
> -
> - am65_cpsw_est_link_up(ndev, link_speed);
> - port->qos.link_down_time = 0;
> -}
> -
> -void am65_cpsw_qos_link_down(struct net_device *ndev)
> -{
> - struct am65_cpsw_port *port = am65_ndev_to_port(ndev);
> -
> - if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TI_AM65_CPSW_TAS))
> - return;
> -
> - if (!port->qos.link_down_time)
> - port->qos.link_down_time = ktime_get();
> -
> - port->qos.link_speed = SPEED_UNKNOWN;
> -}
> -
Could you split the code movement to a separate change?
> + if (port->qos.link_speed != SPEED_UNKNOWN) {
> + if (min_rate_total > port->qos.link_speed) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT_MOD(extack, "TX rate min %llu exceeds link speed %d\n",
> + min_rate_total, port->qos.link_speed);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + if (max_rate_total > port->qos.link_speed) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT_MOD(extack, "TX rate max %llu exceeds link speed %d\n",
> + max_rate_total, port->qos.link_speed);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + }
Link speeds can be renegotiated, and the mqprio offload can be installed
while the link is down. So this restriction, while honorable, has limited
usefulness.
> +
> + p_mqprio->shaper_en = 1;
s/1/true/
> + p_mqprio->max_rate_total = max_t(u64, min_rate_total, max_rate_total);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void am65_cpsw_reset_tc_mqprio(struct net_device *ndev)
> +{
> + struct am65_cpsw_port *port = am65_ndev_to_port(ndev);
> + struct am65_cpsw_mqprio *p_mqprio = &port->qos.mqprio;
> + struct am65_cpsw_common *common = port->common;
> +
> + p_mqprio->shaper_en = 0;
s/0/false/
> + p_mqprio->max_rate_total = 0;
> +
> + am65_cpsw_tx_pn_shaper_reset(port);
> + netdev_reset_tc(ndev);
> + netif_set_real_num_tx_queues(ndev, common->tx_ch_num);
> +
> + /* Reset all Queue priorities to 0 */
> + writel(0,
> + port->port_base + AM65_CPSW_PN_REG_TX_PRI_MAP);
What exactly needs pm_runtime_get_sync()? This writel() doesn't?
> +}
> +
> +static int am65_cpsw_setup_mqprio(struct net_device *ndev, void *type_data)
> +{
> + struct am65_cpsw_port *port = am65_ndev_to_port(ndev);
> + struct am65_cpsw_mqprio *p_mqprio = &port->qos.mqprio;
> + struct tc_mqprio_qopt_offload *mqprio = type_data;
> + struct am65_cpsw_common *common = port->common;
> + struct tc_mqprio_qopt *qopt = &mqprio->qopt;
> + int tc, offset, count, ret, prio;
> + u8 num_tc = qopt->num_tc;
> + u32 tx_prio_map = 0;
> + int i;
> +
> + memcpy(&p_mqprio->mqprio_hw, mqprio, sizeof(*mqprio));
> +
> + if (!num_tc) {
> + am65_cpsw_reset_tc_mqprio(ndev);
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(common->dev);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + pm_runtime_put_noidle(common->dev);
> + return ret;
> + }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists