[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SN7PR12MB720159F33F53B40453111D128BFAA@SN7PR12MB7201.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2023 13:21:44 +0000
From: "Havalige, Thippeswamy" <thippeswamy.havalige@....com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org"
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"lpieralisi@...nel.org" <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
"robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>,
"conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
"Simek, Michal" <michal.simek@....com>,
"Gogada, Bharat Kumar" <bharat.kumar.gogada@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v7 3/3] PCI: xilinx-xdma: Add Xilinx XDMA Root Port driver
Hi Bjorn/ Lorenzo/Krzysztof,
Can you please provide any update on this patch series.
Regards,
Thippeswamy H
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 6, 2023 10:55 PM
> To: Havalige, Thippeswamy <thippeswamy.havalige@....com>
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org;
> bhelgaas@...gle.com; krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org;
> devicetree@...r.kernel.org; linux-pci@...r.kernel.org; lpieralisi@...nel.org;
> robh@...nel.org; conor+dt@...nel.org; Simek, Michal
> <michal.simek@....com>; Gogada, Bharat Kumar
> <bharat.kumar.gogada@....com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/3] PCI: xilinx-xdma: Add Xilinx XDMA Root Port driver
>
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 02:37:07PM +0530, Thippeswamy Havalige wrote:
> > Add support for Xilinx XDMA Soft IP core as Root Port.
> >
> > The Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoCs devices support XDMA soft IP module in
> > programmable logic.
> >
> > The integrated XDMA soft IP block has integrated bridge function that
> > can act as PCIe Root Port.
>
> > + if (!pci_is_root_bus(bus)) {
> > + /* Checking whether the link is up is the last line of
> > + * defense, and this check is inherently racy by definition.
> > + * Sending a PIO request to a downstream device when the
> link is
> > + * down causes an unrecoverable error, and a reset of the
> entire
> > + * PCIe controller will be needed. We can reduce the
> likelihood
> > + * of that unrecoverable error by checking whether the link is
> > + * up, but we can't completely prevent it because the link may
> > + * go down between the link-up check and the PIO request.
> > + */
>
> Looks fine to me. If Lorenzo or Krzysztof thinks this is ready to go, maybe they
> will tidy the comment above, i.e.,
>
> /*
> * Checking whether ...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists