lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 19 Sep 2023 16:45:21 +0200
From:   Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:     io-uring@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        arnd@...db.de, asml.silence@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET v4 0/5] Add io_uring support for waitid

On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 11:06:39AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 9/9/23 9:11 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > This adds support for IORING_OP_WAITID, which is an async variant of
> > the waitid(2) syscall. Rather than have a parent need to block waiting
> > on a child task state change, it can now simply get an async notication
> > when the requested state change has occured.
> > 
> > Patches 1..4 are purely prep patches, and should not have functional
> > changes. They split out parts of do_wait() into __do_wait(), so that
> > the prepare-to-wait and sleep parts are contained within do_wait().
> > 
> > Patch 5 adds io_uring support.
> > 
> > I wrote a few basic tests for this, which can be found in the
> > 'waitid' branch of liburing:
> > 
> > https://git.kernel.dk/cgit/liburing/log/?h=waitid
> > 
> > Also spun a custom kernel for someone to test it, and no issues reported
> > so far.
> 
> Forget to mention that I also ran all the ltp testcases for any wait*
> syscall test, and everything still passes just fine.

I think the struct that this ends up exposing to io_uring is pretty ugly
and it would warrant a larger cleanup. I wouldn't be surprised if you
get some people complain about this.

Other than that I don't have any complaints about the series.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ