linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] acpica: use spinlocks to fix the data-races reported by the KCSAN

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <202309201308.5ZBJFbjh-lkp@intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 20 Sep 2023 13:37:37 +0800
From:   kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To:     Mirsad Goran Todorovac <mirsad.todorovac@....unizg.hr>,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, acpica-devel@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
        Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Jung-uk Kim <jkim@...ebsd.org>,
        Erik Kaneda <erik.kaneda@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] acpica: use spinlocks to fix the data-races
 reported by the KCSAN

Hi Mirsad,

kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:

[auto build test WARNING on linus/master]
[also build test WARNING on v6.6-rc2 next-20230920]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Mirsad-Goran-Todorovac/acpica-use-spinlocks-to-fix-the-data-races-reported-by-the-KCSAN/20230920-080345
base:   linus/master
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920000139.15533-1-mirsad.todorovac%40alu.unizg.hr
patch subject: [PATCH v1 1/1] acpica: use spinlocks to fix the data-races reported by the KCSAN
config: i386-randconfig-012-20230920 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230920/202309201308.5ZBJFbjh-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-22) 9.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230920/202309201308.5ZBJFbjh-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309201308.5ZBJFbjh-lkp@intel.com/

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from include/linux/spinlock.h:89,
                    from include/linux/wait.h:9,
                    from include/linux/pid.h:6,
                    from include/linux/sched.h:14,
                    from include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h:55,
                    from include/acpi/platform/acenv.h:160,
                    from include/acpi/acpi.h:22,
                    from drivers/acpi/acpica/utdebug.c:12:
>> drivers/acpi/acpica/utdebug.c:19:24: warning: 'acpi_utdebug_lock' defined but not used [-Wunused-variable]
      19 | static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(acpi_utdebug_lock);
         |                        ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   include/linux/spinlock_types.h:43:39: note: in definition of macro 'DEFINE_SPINLOCK'
      43 | #define DEFINE_SPINLOCK(x) spinlock_t x = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(x)
         |                                       ^


vim +/acpi_utdebug_lock +19 drivers/acpi/acpica/utdebug.c

    11	
  > 12	#include <acpi/acpi.h>
    13	#include "accommon.h"
    14	#include "acinterp.h"
    15	
    16	#define _COMPONENT          ACPI_UTILITIES
    17	ACPI_MODULE_NAME("utdebug")
    18	
  > 19	static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(acpi_utdebug_lock);
    20	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki