[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bc4bd049-1e29-0f23-cca6-493abb5e774f@suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 08:07:53 +0200
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>, Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/6] mm: page_alloc: freelist migratetype hygiene
On 9/20/23 03:38, Zi Yan wrote:
> On 19 Sep 2023, at 20:32, Mike Kravetz wrote:
>
>> On 09/19/23 16:57, Zi Yan wrote:
>>> On 19 Sep 2023, at 14:47, Mike Kravetz wrote:
>>>
>>>> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
>>>> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
>>>> @@ -1651,8 +1651,13 @@ static bool prep_move_freepages_block(struct zone *zone, struct page *page,
>>>> end = pageblock_end_pfn(pfn) - 1;
>>>>
>>>> /* Do not cross zone boundaries */
>>>> +#if 0
>>>> if (!zone_spans_pfn(zone, start))
>>>> start = zone->zone_start_pfn;
>>>> +#else
>>>> + if (!zone_spans_pfn(zone, start))
>>>> + start = pfn;
>>>> +#endif
>>>> if (!zone_spans_pfn(zone, end))
>>>> return false;
>>>> I can still trigger warnings.
>>>
>>> OK. One thing to note is that the page type in the warning changed from
>>> 5 (MIGRATE_ISOLATE) to 0 (MIGRATE_UNMOVABLE) with my suggested change.
>>>
>>
>> Just to be really clear,
>> - the 5 (MIGRATE_ISOLATE) warning was from the __alloc_pages call path.
>> - the 0 (MIGRATE_UNMOVABLE) as above was from the alloc_contig_range call
>> path WITHOUT your change.
>>
>> I am guessing the difference here has more to do with the allocation path?
>>
>> I went back and reran focusing on the specific migrate type.
>> Without your patch, and coming from the alloc_contig_range call path,
>> I got two warnings of 'page type is 0, passed migratetype is 1' as above.
>> With your patch I got one 'page type is 0, passed migratetype is 1'
>> warning and one 'page type is 1, passed migratetype is 0' warning.
>>
>> I could be wrong, but I do not think your patch changes things.
>
> Got it. Thanks for the clarification.
>>
>>>>
>>>> One idea about recreating the issue is that it may have to do with size
>>>> of my VM (16G) and the requested allocation sizes 4G. However, I tried
>>>> to really stress the allocations by increasing the number of hugetlb
>>>> pages requested and that did not help. I also noticed that I only seem
>>>> to get two warnings and then they stop, even if I continue to run the
>>>> script.
>>>>
>>>> Zi asked about my config, so it is attached.
>>>
>>> With your config, I still have no luck reproducing the issue. I will keep
>>> trying. Thanks.
>>>
>>
>> Perhaps try running both scripts in parallel?
>
> Yes. It seems to do the trick.
>
>> Adjust the number of hugetlb pages allocated to equal 25% of memory?
>
> I am able to reproduce it with the script below:
>
> while true; do
> echo 4 > /sys/kernel/mm/hugepages/hugepages-1048576kB/nr_hugepages&
> echo 2048 > /sys/kernel/mm/hugepages/hugepages-2048kB/nr_hugepages&
> wait
> echo 0 > /sys/kernel/mm/hugepages/hugepages-2048kB/nr_hugepages
> echo 0 > /sys/kernel/mm/hugepages/hugepages-1048576kB/nr_hugepages
> done
>
> I will look into the issue.
With migratetypes 0 and 1 and somewhat harder to reproduce scenario (= less
deterministic, more racy) it's possible we now see what I suspected can
happen here:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/37dbd4d0-c125-6694-dec4-6322ae5b6dee@suse.cz/
In that there are places reading the migratetype outside of zone lock.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists