[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230920074413.1361547-1-feng.tang@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 15:44:13 +0800
From: Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH] mm/slub: add sanity check for slub_min/max_order cmdline setup
Currently there are 2 parameters could be setup from kernel cmdline:
slub_min_order and slub_max_order. It's possible that the user
configured slub_min_order is bigger than the default slub_max_order
[1], which can still take effect, as calculate_oder() will use MAX_ORDER
as a fallback to check against, but has some downsides:
* the kernel message about SLUB will be strange in showing min/max
orders:
SLUB: HWalign=64, Order=9-3, MinObjects=0, CPUs=16, Nodes=1
* in calculate_order() called by each slab, the 2 loops of
calc_slab_order() will all be meaningless due to slub_min_order
is bigger than slub_max_order
* prevent future code cleanup like in [2].
Fix it by adding some sanity check to enforce the min/max semantics.
[1]. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/21a0ba8b-bf05-0799-7c78-2a35f8c8d52a@os.amperecomputing.com/
[2]. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230908145302.30320-7-vbabka@suse.cz/
Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
---
mm/slub.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index f7940048138c..b36e5eb0ccb7 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -4711,6 +4711,9 @@ static int __init setup_slub_min_order(char *str)
{
get_option(&str, (int *)&slub_min_order);
+ if (slub_min_order > slub_max_order)
+ slub_max_order = slub_min_order;
+
return 1;
}
@@ -4721,6 +4724,9 @@ static int __init setup_slub_max_order(char *str)
get_option(&str, (int *)&slub_max_order);
slub_max_order = min_t(unsigned int, slub_max_order, MAX_ORDER);
+ if (slub_min_order > slub_max_order)
+ slub_min_order = slub_max_order;
+
return 1;
}
--
2.27.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists