[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0d92b375-c583-a21e-4e5b-355932a8b30e@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 16:15:03 +0800
From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
"Yin, Fengwei" <fengwei.yin@...el.com>,
Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Rohan Puri <rohan.puri15@...il.com>,
Mcgrof Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Adam Manzanares <a.manzanares@...sung.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] mm/compaction: optimize >0 order folio compaction
with free page split.
On 9/19/2023 1:20 AM, Zi Yan wrote:
> On 18 Sep 2023, at 3:34, Baolin Wang wrote:
>
>> On 9/13/2023 12:28 AM, Zi Yan wrote:
>>> From: Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>
>>>
>>> During migration in a memory compaction, free pages are placed in an array
>>> of page lists based on their order. But the desired free page order (i.e.,
>>> the order of a source page) might not be always present, thus leading to
>>> migration failures. Split a high order free pages when source migration
>>> page has a lower order to increase migration successful rate.
>>>
>>> Note: merging free pages when a migration fails and a lower order free
>>> page is returned via compaction_free() is possible, but there is too much
>>> work. Since the free pages are not buddy pages, it is hard to identify
>>> these free pages using existing PFN-based page merging algorithm.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>
>>> ---
>>> mm/compaction.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
>>> index 868e92e55d27..45747ab5f380 100644
>>> --- a/mm/compaction.c
>>> +++ b/mm/compaction.c
>>> @@ -1801,9 +1801,46 @@ static struct folio *compaction_alloc(struct folio *src, unsigned long data)
>>> struct compact_control *cc = (struct compact_control *)data;
>>> struct folio *dst;
>>> int order = folio_order(src);
>>> + bool has_isolated_pages = false;
>>> +again:
>>> if (!cc->freepages[order].nr_free) {
>>> - isolate_freepages(cc);
>>> + int i;
>>> +
>>> + for (i = order + 1; i <= MAX_ORDER; i++) {
>>> + if (cc->freepages[i].nr_free) {
>>> + struct page *freepage =
>>> + list_first_entry(&cc->freepages[i].pages,
>>> + struct page, lru);
>>> +
>>> + int start_order = i;
>>> + unsigned long size = 1 << start_order;
>>> +
>>> + list_del(&freepage->lru);
>>> + cc->freepages[i].nr_free--;
>>> +
>>> + while (start_order > order) {
>>> + start_order--;
>>> + size >>= 1;
>>> +
>>> + list_add(&freepage[size].lru,
>>> + &cc->freepages[start_order].pages);
>>> + cc->freepages[start_order].nr_free++;
>>> + set_page_private(&freepage[size], start_order);
>>
>> IIUC, these split pages should also call functions to initialize? e.g. prep_compound_page()?
>
> Not at this place. It is done right below and above "done" label. When free pages
> are on cc->freepages, we want to keep them without being post_alloc_hook() or
> prep_compound_page() processed for a possible future split. A free page is
> only initialized when it is returned by compaction_alloc().
Ah, I see. Thanks for explanation.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists