[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZQq2cT+/QCenR5gx@shikoro>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 11:08:01 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
To: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>
Cc: Jan Bottorff <janb@...amperecomputing.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Yann Sionneau <ysionneau@...rayinc.com>,
Yann Sionneau <yann@...nneau.net>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Jan Dabros <jsd@...ihalf.com>,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: designware: Fix corrupted memory seen in the ISR
> same thread." [1] Thus I'd suggest the next fix for the problem:
>
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-common.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-common.c
> @@ -72,7 +72,10 @@ static int dw_reg_write(void *context, unsigned int reg, unsigned int val)
> {
> struct dw_i2c_dev *dev = context;
>
> - writel_relaxed(val, dev->base + reg);
> + if (reg == DW_IC_INTR_MASK)
> + writel(val, dev->base + reg);
> + else
> + writel_relaxed(val, dev->base + reg);
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> (and similar changes for dw_reg_write_swab() and dw_reg_write_word().)
>
> What do you think?
To me, this looks reasonable and much more what I would have expected as
a result (from a high level point of view). Let's hope it works. I am
optimistic, though...
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists