[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <114145FFA8546AF1+24aac21b-3748-3d50-4154-a25ab59be1be@tinylab.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 18:04:10 +0800
From: Song Shuai <songshuaishuai@...ylab.org>
To: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, aou@...s.berkeley.edu,
anup@...infault.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -fixes] riscv: Remove duplicate objcopy flag
在 2023/9/20 17:52, Palmer Dabbelt 写道:
> On Thu, 14 Sep 2023 02:13:34 PDT (-0700), songshuaishuai@...ylab.org wrote:
>> There are two duplicate `-O binary` flags when objcopying from vmlinux
>> to Image/xipImage.
>>
>> RISC-V set `-O binary` flag in both OBJCOPYFLAGS in the top-level riscv
>> Makefile and OBJCOPYFLAGS_* in the boot/Makefile, and the objcopy cmd
>> in Kbuild would join them together.
>>
>> The `-O binary` flag is only needed for objcopying Image, so remove the
>> OBJCOPYFLAGS in the top-level riscv Makefile.
>>
>> Fixes: c0fbcd991860 ("RISC-V: Build flat and compressed kernel images")
>> Signed-off-by: Song Shuai <songshuaishuai@...ylab.org>
>> ---
>> arch/riscv/Makefile | 1 -
>> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/Makefile b/arch/riscv/Makefile
>> index 1329e060c548..b43a6bb7e4dc 100644
>> --- a/arch/riscv/Makefile
>> +++ b/arch/riscv/Makefile
>> @@ -6,7 +6,6 @@
>> # for more details.
>> #
>>
>> -OBJCOPYFLAGS := -O binary
>> LDFLAGS_vmlinux := -z norelro
>> ifeq ($(CONFIG_RELOCATABLE),y)
>> LDFLAGS_vmlinux += -shared -Bsymbolic -z notext --emit-relocs
>
> Does this result in any incorrect behavior? It looks fine to me, but if
Nop, objcopy works as it's expected. You can put this patch on -next.
> there's no regression I'll put in on -next instead of -fixes.
>
> Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...osinc.com>
>
--
Thanks
Song Shuai
Powered by blists - more mailing lists