[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230920003239.GD112714@monkey>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2023 17:32:39 -0700
From: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
To: Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/6] mm: page_alloc: freelist migratetype hygiene
On 09/19/23 16:57, Zi Yan wrote:
> On 19 Sep 2023, at 14:47, Mike Kravetz wrote:
>
> > On 09/19/23 02:49, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> >> On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 10:40:37AM -0700, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> >>> On 09/18/23 10:52, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> >>>> On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 09:16:58AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> >>>>> On 9/16/23 21:57, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> >>>>>> On 09/15/23 10:16, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 04:52:38PM -0700, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> >
> > Sorry for causing the confusion!
> >
> > When I originally saw the warnings pop up, I was running the above script
> > as well as another that only allocated order 9 hugetlb pages:
> >
> > while true; do
> > echo 2048 > /sys/kernel/mm/hugepages/hugepages-2048kB/nr_hugepages
> > echo 0 > /sys/kernel/mm/hugepages/hugepages-2048kB/nr_hugepages
> > done
> >
> > The warnings were actually triggered by allocations in this second script.
> >
> > However, when reporting the warnings I wanted to include the simplest
> > way to recreate. And, I noticed that that second script running in
> > parallel was not required. Again, sorry for the confusion! Here is a
> > warning triggered via the alloc_contig_range path only running the one
> > script.
> >
> > [ 107.275821] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > [ 107.277001] page type is 0, passed migratetype is 1 (nr=512)
> > [ 107.278379] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 886 at mm/page_alloc.c:699 del_page_from_free_list+0x137/0x170
> > [ 107.280514] Modules linked in: rfkill ip6table_filter ip6_tables sunrpc snd_hda_codec_generic joydev 9p snd_hda_intel netfs snd_intel_dspcfg snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep 9pnet_virtio snd_hda_core snd_seq snd_seq_device 9pnet virtio_balloon snd_pcm snd_timer snd soundcore virtio_net net_failover failover virtio_console virtio_blk crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul crc32c_intel ghash_clmulni_intel serio_raw virtio_pci virtio virtio_pci_legacy_dev virtio_pci_modern_dev virtio_ring fuse
> > [ 107.291033] CPU: 1 PID: 886 Comm: bash Not tainted 6.6.0-rc2-next-20230919-dirty #35
> > [ 107.293000] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.2-1.fc37 04/01/2014
> > [ 107.295187] RIP: 0010:del_page_from_free_list+0x137/0x170
> > [ 107.296618] Code: c6 05 20 9b 35 01 01 e8 b7 fb ff ff 44 89 f1 44 89 e2 48 c7 c7 d8 ab 22 82 48 89 c6 b8 01 00 00 00 d3 e0 89 c1 e8 e9 99 df ff <0f> 0b e9 03 ff ff ff 48 c7 c6 10 ac 22 82 48 89 df e8 f3 e0 fc ff
> > [ 107.301236] RSP: 0018:ffffc90003ba7a70 EFLAGS: 00010086
> > [ 107.302535] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffea0007ff8000 RCX: 0000000000000000
> > [ 107.304467] RDX: 0000000000000004 RSI: ffffffff8224e9de RDI: 00000000ffffffff
> > [ 107.306289] RBP: 00000000001ffe00 R08: 0000000000009ffb R09: 00000000ffffdfff
> > [ 107.308135] R10: 00000000ffffdfff R11: ffffffff824660e0 R12: 0000000000000001
> > [ 107.309956] R13: ffff88827fffcd80 R14: 0000000000000009 R15: 00000000001ffc00
> > [ 107.311839] FS: 00007fabb8cba740(0000) GS:ffff888277d00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> > [ 107.314695] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> > [ 107.316159] CR2: 00007f41ba01acf0 CR3: 0000000282ed4006 CR4: 0000000000370ee0
> > [ 107.317971] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> > [ 107.319783] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> > [ 107.321575] Call Trace:
> > [ 107.322314] <TASK>
> > [ 107.323002] ? del_page_from_free_list+0x137/0x170
> > [ 107.324380] ? __warn+0x7d/0x130
> > [ 107.325341] ? del_page_from_free_list+0x137/0x170
> > [ 107.326627] ? report_bug+0x18d/0x1c0
> > [ 107.327632] ? prb_read_valid+0x17/0x20
> > [ 107.328711] ? handle_bug+0x41/0x70
> > [ 107.329685] ? exc_invalid_op+0x13/0x60
> > [ 107.330787] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20
> > [ 107.331937] ? del_page_from_free_list+0x137/0x170
> > [ 107.333189] __free_one_page+0x2ab/0x6f0
> > [ 107.334375] free_pcppages_bulk+0x169/0x210
> > [ 107.335575] drain_pages_zone+0x3f/0x50
> > [ 107.336691] __drain_all_pages+0xe2/0x1e0
> > [ 107.337843] alloc_contig_range+0x143/0x280
> > [ 107.339026] alloc_contig_pages+0x210/0x270
> > [ 107.340200] alloc_fresh_hugetlb_folio+0xa6/0x270
> > [ 107.341529] alloc_pool_huge_page+0x7d/0x100
> > [ 107.342745] set_max_huge_pages+0x162/0x340
> > [ 107.345059] nr_hugepages_store_common+0x91/0xf0
> > [ 107.346329] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x108/0x1f0
> > [ 107.347547] vfs_write+0x207/0x400
> > [ 107.348543] ksys_write+0x63/0xe0
> > [ 107.349511] do_syscall_64+0x37/0x90
> > [ 107.350543] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8
> > [ 107.351940] RIP: 0033:0x7fabb8daee87
> > [ 107.352819] Code: 0d 00 f7 d8 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb b7 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 10 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 51 c3 48 83 ec 28 48 89 54 24 18 48 89 74 24
> > [ 107.356373] RSP: 002b:00007ffc02737478 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001
> > [ 107.358103] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000002 RCX: 00007fabb8daee87
> > [ 107.359695] RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: 000055fe584a1620 RDI: 0000000000000001
> > [ 107.361258] RBP: 000055fe584a1620 R08: 000000000000000a R09: 00007fabb8e460c0
> > [ 107.362842] R10: 00007fabb8e45fc0 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000002
> > [ 107.364385] R13: 00007fabb8e82520 R14: 0000000000000002 R15: 00007fabb8e82720
> > [ 107.365968] </TASK>
> > [ 107.366534] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
> > [ 121.542474] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> >
> > Perhaps that is another piece of information in that the warning can be
> > triggered via both allocation paths.
> >
> > To be perfectly clear, here is what I did today:
> > - built next-20230919. It does not contain your series
> > I could not recreate the issue.
> > - Added your series and the patch to remove
> > VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(is_migrate_isolate(mt), page) from free_pcppages_bulk
> > I could recreate the issue while running only the one script.
> > The warning above is from that run.
> > - Added this suggested patch from Zi
> > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > index 1400e674ab86..77a4aea31a7f 100644
> > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > @@ -1651,8 +1651,13 @@ static bool prep_move_freepages_block(struct zone *zone, struct page *page,
> > end = pageblock_end_pfn(pfn) - 1;
> >
> > /* Do not cross zone boundaries */
> > +#if 0
> > if (!zone_spans_pfn(zone, start))
> > start = zone->zone_start_pfn;
> > +#else
> > + if (!zone_spans_pfn(zone, start))
> > + start = pfn;
> > +#endif
> > if (!zone_spans_pfn(zone, end))
> > return false;
> > I can still trigger warnings.
>
> OK. One thing to note is that the page type in the warning changed from
> 5 (MIGRATE_ISOLATE) to 0 (MIGRATE_UNMOVABLE) with my suggested change.
>
Just to be really clear,
- the 5 (MIGRATE_ISOLATE) warning was from the __alloc_pages call path.
- the 0 (MIGRATE_UNMOVABLE) as above was from the alloc_contig_range call
path WITHOUT your change.
I am guessing the difference here has more to do with the allocation path?
I went back and reran focusing on the specific migrate type.
Without your patch, and coming from the alloc_contig_range call path,
I got two warnings of 'page type is 0, passed migratetype is 1' as above.
With your patch I got one 'page type is 0, passed migratetype is 1'
warning and one 'page type is 1, passed migratetype is 0' warning.
I could be wrong, but I do not think your patch changes things.
> >
> > One idea about recreating the issue is that it may have to do with size
> > of my VM (16G) and the requested allocation sizes 4G. However, I tried
> > to really stress the allocations by increasing the number of hugetlb
> > pages requested and that did not help. I also noticed that I only seem
> > to get two warnings and then they stop, even if I continue to run the
> > script.
> >
> > Zi asked about my config, so it is attached.
>
> With your config, I still have no luck reproducing the issue. I will keep
> trying. Thanks.
>
Perhaps try running both scripts in parallel?
Adjust the number of hugetlb pages allocated to equal 25% of memory?
--
Mike Kravetz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists