[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2375603.NG923GbCHz@kreacher>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 20:04:49 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v1 12/13] ACPI: thermal: Drop critical_valid and hot_valid trip flags
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
The critical_valid and hot_valid flags in struct acpi_thermal_trips are
only used during initialization and they are only false if the
corresponding trip temperatures are equal to THERMAL_TEMP_INVALID, so
drop them and use THERMAL_TEMP_INVALID checks instead of them where
applicable.
No intentional functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
---
drivers/acpi/thermal.c | 25 ++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/thermal.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/thermal.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/thermal.c
@@ -100,8 +100,6 @@ struct acpi_thermal_active {
struct acpi_thermal_trips {
struct acpi_thermal_passive passive;
struct acpi_thermal_active active[ACPI_THERMAL_MAX_ACTIVE];
- bool critical_valid;
- bool hot_valid;
};
struct acpi_thermal {
@@ -355,13 +353,13 @@ static long acpi_thermal_get_critical_tr
}
if (crt == -1) {
acpi_handle_debug(tz->device->handle, "Critical threshold disabled\n");
- goto fail;
+ return THERMAL_TEMP_INVALID;
}
status = acpi_evaluate_integer(tz->device->handle, "_CRT", NULL, &tmp);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
acpi_handle_debug(tz->device->handle, "No critical threshold\n");
- goto fail;
+ return THERMAL_TEMP_INVALID;
}
if (tmp <= 2732) {
/*
@@ -369,17 +367,12 @@ static long acpi_thermal_get_critical_tr
* so discard them as invalid.
*/
pr_info(FW_BUG "Invalid critical threshold (%llu)\n", tmp);
- goto fail;
+ return THERMAL_TEMP_INVALID;
}
set:
- tz->trips.critical_valid = true;
acpi_handle_debug(tz->device->handle, "Critical threshold [%llu]\n", tmp);
return tmp;
-
-fail:
- tz->trips.critical_valid = false;
- return THERMAL_TEMP_INVALID;
}
static long acpi_thermal_get_hot_trip(struct acpi_thermal *tz)
@@ -389,12 +382,10 @@ static long acpi_thermal_get_hot_trip(st
status = acpi_evaluate_integer(tz->device->handle, "_HOT", NULL, &tmp);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
- tz->trips.hot_valid = false;
acpi_handle_debug(tz->device->handle, "No hot threshold\n");
return THERMAL_TEMP_INVALID;
}
- tz->trips.hot_valid = true;
acpi_handle_debug(tz->device->handle, "Hot threshold [%llu]\n", tmp);
return tmp;
}
@@ -789,7 +780,7 @@ static void acpi_thermal_aml_dependency_
*/
static void acpi_thermal_guess_offset(struct acpi_thermal *tz, long crit_temp)
{
- if (tz->trips.critical_valid && crit_temp % 5 == 1)
+ if (crit_temp != THERMAL_TEMP_INVALID && crit_temp % 5 == 1)
tz->kelvin_offset = 273100;
else
tz->kelvin_offset = 273200;
@@ -850,11 +841,11 @@ static int acpi_thermal_add(struct acpi_
trip_count = acpi_thermal_get_trip_points(tz);
crit_temp = acpi_thermal_get_critical_trip(tz);
- if (tz->trips.critical_valid)
+ if (crit_temp != THERMAL_TEMP_INVALID)
trip_count++;
hot_temp = acpi_thermal_get_hot_trip(tz);
- if (tz->trips.hot_valid)
+ if (hot_temp != THERMAL_TEMP_INVALID)
trip_count++;
if (!trip_count) {
@@ -886,13 +877,13 @@ static int acpi_thermal_add(struct acpi_
tz->trip_table = trip;
- if (tz->trips.critical_valid) {
+ if (crit_temp != THERMAL_TEMP_INVALID) {
trip->type = THERMAL_TRIP_CRITICAL;
trip->temperature = acpi_thermal_temp(tz, crit_temp);
trip++;
}
- if (tz->trips.hot_valid) {
+ if (hot_temp != THERMAL_TEMP_INVALID) {
trip->type = THERMAL_TRIP_HOT;
trip->temperature = acpi_thermal_temp(tz, hot_temp);
trip++;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists