[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <37fe9352-ec84-47b8-bb49-9441987ca1b9@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 15:21:00 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Choong Yong Liang <yong.liang.choong@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Rajneesh Bhardwaj <irenic.rajneesh@...il.com>,
David E Box <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Mark Gross <markgross@...nel.org>,
Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Marek BehĂșn <kabel@...nel.org>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Wong Vee Khee <veekhee@...le.com>,
Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
Revanth Kumar Uppala <ruppala@...dia.com>,
Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang@....com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andrey.konovalov@...aro.org>,
Jochen Henneberg <jh@...neberg-systemdesign.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, Voon Wei Feng <weifeng.voon@...el.com>,
Tan Tee Min <tee.min.tan@...ux.intel.com>,
Michael Sit Wei Hong <michael.wei.hong.sit@...el.com>,
Lai Peter Jun Ann <jun.ann.lai@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/5] TSN auto negotiation between 1G and 2.5G
> Hi Andrew,
>
> After conducting a comprehensive study, it seems that implementing
> out-of-band for all link modes might not be feasible. I may have missed some
> key aspects during my analysis.
>
> Would you be open to sharing a high-level idea of how we could potentially
> make this feasible? Your insights would be greatly appreciated.
stmmac_mac_link_up() gets passed interface, speed and duplex. That
tells you what the PHY has negotiated. Is there anything else you need
to know?
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists