linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/367] 5.4.257-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8c686e7b-a770-4336-a047-4f2e2739405f@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Thu, 21 Sep 2023 08:55:37 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
        srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/367] 5.4.257-rc1 review

On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 01:26:17PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.257 release.
> There are 367 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Fri, 22 Sep 2023 11:28:09 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 

Build results:
	total: 154 pass: 152 fail: 2
Failed builds:
	i386:tools/perf
	x86_64:tools/perf
Qemu test results:
	total: 464 pass: 464 fail: 0

libbpf.c: In function ‘bpf_object__close’:
libbpf.c:4205:15: error: ‘struct bpf_object’ has no member named ‘btf_vmlinux’

Old question: Should we stop build testing perf on older kernels ?
If so, why are perf patches backported ?

Guenter