linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 07/13] cpufreq: scmi: Drop redundant ifdef in scmi_cpufreq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230921132927.ca6qoewimwn2xzh5@bogus>
Date:   Thu, 21 Sep 2023 14:29:27 +0100
From:   Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To:     Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc:     Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>,
        Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Nikunj Kela <nkela@...cinc.com>,
        Prasad Sodagudi <psodagud@...cinc.com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/13] cpufreq: scmi: Drop redundant ifdef in
 scmi_cpufreq_probe()

On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 03:02:16PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Sept 2023 at 13:14, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 01:26:27PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > > We have stubs for devm_of_clk_add_hw_provider(), so there should be no need
> > > to protect this with the '#ifdef CONFIG_COMMON_CLK'. Let's drop it to clean
> > > up the code a bit.
> > >
> >
> > No exactly. The stub is under !CONFIG_OF but we need it for !CONFIG_COMMON_CLK.
> > The original build issue reported for which I add this was CONFIG_OF=y &&
> > CONFIG_COMMON_CLK=n.
> >
> > It looks like it is still valid combo though I don't have a handy randconfig
> > to present to you. I prefer to drop this for now if that is OK with you.
> 
> Sure, it's perfectly fine to drop it. It's just a thing I stumbled
> over that isn't really needed in the $subject series!
> 

Thanks !

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep