linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 12/13] PM: domains: Allow genpd providers to manage OPP tables directly by its FW

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 21 Sep 2023 14:30:02 +0100
From:   Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To:     Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc:     Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>,
        Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Nikunj Kela <nkela@...cinc.com>,
        Prasad Sodagudi <psodagud@...cinc.com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 12/13] PM: domains: Allow genpd providers to manage
 OPP tables directly by its FW

On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 03:05:17PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Sept 2023 at 13:20, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 01:26:32PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > > In some cases the OPP tables aren't specified in device tree, but rather
> > > encoded in the FW. To allow a genpd provider to specify them dynamically
> > > instead, let's add a new genpd flag, GENPD_FLAG_OPP_TABLE_FW.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Changes in v3:
> > >       - None.
> > >
> >
> > Just checking if I need Rafael's ack here or that is OK as you are
> > co-maintainer ? Again asking explicitly to ensure arm-soc is happy when
> > I send PR.
> 
> This should be fine for you to pick up. Rafael would have objected if
> this was something that he didn't like. Moreover, there's no other
> patches being queued for genpd at this moment so no worries of
> conflicts.
> 

Fair enough :), but I just wanted to confirm.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep