[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOMZO5AjMGA5TtTJH2b7Fs_C3bj84UZr378FVsp5S+ver8_WpQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 09:58:47 -0300
From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To: kuba@...nel.org
Cc: andrew@...n.ch, f.fainelli@...il.com, olteanv@...il.com,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
l00g33k@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Fabio Estevam <festevam@...x.de>,
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Avoid EEPROM timeout when
EEPROM is absent
On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 3:47 PM Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com> wrote:
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
> @@ -3012,14 +3012,16 @@ static void mv88e6xxx_hardware_reset(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip)
> * from the wrong location resulting in the switch booting
> * to wrong mode and inoperable.
> */
> - mv88e6xxx_g1_wait_eeprom_done(chip);
> + if (chip->info->ops->get_eeprom)
> + mv88e6xxx_g2_eeprom_wait(chip);
Just realized that I should also remove the
mv88e6xxx_g1_wait_eeprom_done() definition, as it becomes unused now.
I will send a v3 with such a change, but will wait for more comments first.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists