[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230921143108.GB20728@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 16:31:08 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Alexey Gladkov <legion@...nel.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] seqlock: simplify SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME()
On 09/21, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 01:48:26PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > Can you look at 2/5? To me it looks like a good cleanup too.
> > I am going to resend 1/5 and 2/5, as no one is interested in
> > stats_lock change.
>
> 2 seems okay. Will need a new changelog without the rest thouhg. Perhaps
> talk about how it perserves the constness instead?
OK, will do, thanks.
Oleg.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists