[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFrSkgSee=8zruR65TALvAj+hcWw1CaUOUwD3EpdxymtBg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 15:22:54 +0200
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Cc: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>,
Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Nikunj Kela <nkela@...cinc.com>,
Prasad Sodagudi <psodagud@...cinc.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 08/13] dt-bindings: arm: cpus: Add a power-domain-name
for a performance-domain
On Thu, 21 Sept 2023 at 13:11, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 01:26:28PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > When an CPU's performance domain is managed through the SCMI firmware,
> > let's enable us describe this as a consumer of a power-domain provider,
> > which is the de-facto standard to use for performance domains. In this
> > case, let's specify a corresponding power-domain-name, to point out the
> > corresponding index for it.
> >
> > Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>
> > Cc: Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
> > Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org
> > Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
> > ---
> >
> > Changes in v3:
> > - New patch.
>
> This patch and 10/13 are quite generic. I am happy to take it as part of
> this series but just thought of checking again if that is what you prefer ?
Yes please, go ahead and pick this up through your scmi tree.
Kind regards
Uffe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists