linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 net-next 3/5] net: dsa: tag_ksz: Extend ksz9477

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230921191229.72v3ndgli66lyhdy@skbuf>
Date:   Thu, 21 Sep 2023 22:12:29 +0300
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To:     Lukasz Majewski <lukma@...x.de>
Cc:     Tristram.Ha@...rochip.com, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, davem@...emloft.net,
        Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@...rochip.com>,
        Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 net-next 3/5] net: dsa: tag_ksz: Extend ksz9477_xmit()
 for HSR frame duplication

On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 01:43:41PM +0200, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> The KSZ9477 has support for HSR (High-Availability Seamless Redundancy).
> One of its offloading (i.e. performed in the switch IC hardware) features
> is to duplicate received frame to both HSR aware switch ports.
> 
> To achieve this goal - the tail TAG needs to be modified. To be more
> specific, both ports must be marked as destination (egress) ones.
> 
> The NETIF_F_HW_HSR_DUP flag indicates that the device supports HSR and
> assures (in HSR core code) that frame is sent only once from HOST to
> switch with tail tag indicating both ports.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <lukma@...x.de>
> 
> ---

I'm not sure what in your process causes this, but there is an atypical
extra new line between the last Signed-off-by: line and ---. Anyway.

Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>