lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <61e316c5-e504-4ad1-93a3-f2df5a16b654@lunn.ch>
Date:   Thu, 21 Sep 2023 21:19:30 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Parthiban.Veerasooran@...rochip.com
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
        pabeni@...hat.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
        corbet@....net, Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com,
        rdunlap@...radead.org, horms@...nel.org, casper.casan@...il.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        Horatiu.Vultur@...rochip.com, Woojung.Huh@...rochip.com,
        Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
        Thorsten.Kummermehr@...rochip.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 1/6] net: ethernet: implement OPEN Alliance
 control transaction interface

> Yes, as "struct oa_tc6" and its members are not or going to be accessed 
> in the MAC driver, I will consider this as an opaque structure and 
> declare it as void *opaque_oa_tc6 in the MAC driver private structure 
> "struct lan865x_priv" and will pass to the APIs exported from oa_tc6.c lib.
> 
> Is my understanding correct?

Yes.

If the structure is going to be truly opaque, i suggest having it in
the C file, not the H file.

	Andrew

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ