[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230921112521.fc07c658804f4e188179da77@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 11:25:21 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>
Cc: maple-tree@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pedro.falcato@...il.com,
stable <stable@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] maple_tree: Fix mas_prev() state regression.
On Thu, 21 Sep 2023 14:12:34 -0400 "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com> wrote:
> Pedro Falcato contacted me on IRC with an mprotect regression which was
> bisected back to the iterator changes for maple tree. Root cause
> analysis showed the mas_prev() running off the end of the VMA space
> (previous from 0) followed by mas_find(), would skip the first value.
>
> This patch set introduces maple state underflow/overflow so the sequence
> of calls on the maple state will return what the user expects.
It isn't clear what are the user-visible effects of this flaw? Please
send this along and I'll paste it in.
Patch 1 should be titled "Add mas_is_active ...".
And patch 1 should have had cc:stable in the changelog.
It's stable@...r.kernel.org, although stable@...nel.org works just fine.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists