linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/6] vlynq: remove bus driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5a2ee8c1-6058-ee65-7959-d191c075748e@linaro.org>
Date:   Thu, 21 Sep 2023 14:32:49 +0200
From:   Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@...aro.org>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
        linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, Jonas Gorski <jonas.gorski@...il.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] vlynq: remove bus driver

On 21/9/23 14:06, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 12:37:54PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> On 20/9/23 22:10, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>>> There are no users with a vlynq_driver in the Kernel tree. Also, only
>>> the AR7 platform ever initialized a VLYNQ bus, but AR7 is going to be
>>> removed from the Kernel. OpenWRT had some out-of-tree drivers which they
>>> probably intended to upport, but AR7 devices are even there not
>>
>> Typo "support".
> 
> "support" would also fit, but we use the term "upporting" frequently to
> express that we want to bring some code from downstream to upstream.

Oh I see, thanks, TIL :)