[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f10db291-dee8-e4b7-2f97-a3237122a2ad@microchip.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2023 04:39:09 +0000
From: <Parthiban.Veerasooran@...rochip.com>
To: <andrew@...n.ch>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
<pabeni@...hat.com>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
<corbet@....net>, <Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com>,
<rdunlap@...radead.org>, <horms@...nel.org>,
<casper.casan@...il.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <Horatiu.Vultur@...rochip.com>,
<Woojung.Huh@...rochip.com>, <Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>,
<UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>, <Thorsten.Kummermehr@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 1/6] net: ethernet: implement OPEN Alliance
control transaction interface
Hi Andrew,
On 22/09/23 12:49 am, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>
>> Yes, as "struct oa_tc6" and its members are not or going to be accessed
>> in the MAC driver, I will consider this as an opaque structure and
>> declare it as void *opaque_oa_tc6 in the MAC driver private structure
>> "struct lan865x_priv" and will pass to the APIs exported from oa_tc6.c lib.
>>
>> Is my understanding correct?
>
> Yes.
>
> If the structure is going to be truly opaque, i suggest having it in
> the C file, not the H file.
Yes for sure, I will move it to oa_tc6.c file.
Andrew, thanks a lot for all your comments. They are all really helping
me to know/learn many things to improve my patches and coding style.
Please keep supporting.
Best Regards,
Parthiban V
>
> Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists