[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZQ3f8wY0R8OqEmIl@liuwe-devbox-debian-v2>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2023 18:41:55 +0000
From: Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>
To: Saurabh Sengar <ssengar@...ux.microsoft.com>
Cc: kys@...rosoft.com, haiyangz@...rosoft.com, wei.liu@...nel.org,
decui@...rosoft.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org,
hpa@...or.com, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mikelley@...rosoft.com,
vkuznets@...hat.com, ssengar@...rosoft.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] x86/hyperv: Restrict get_vtl to only VTL platforms
On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 09:04:35PM -0700, Saurabh Sengar wrote:
> When Linux runs in a non-default VTL (CONFIG_HYPERV_VTL_MODE=y),
> get_vtl() must never fail as its return value is used in negotiations
> with the host. In the more generic case, (CONFIG_HYPERV_VTL_MODE=n) the
> VTL is always zero so there's no need to do the hypercall.
>
> Make get_vtl() BUG() in case of failure and put the implementation under
> "if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HYPERV_VTL_MODE)" to avoid the call altogether in
> the most generic use case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Saurabh Sengar <ssengar@...ux.microsoft.com>
> Reviewed-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Applied to hyperv-fixes. Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists