linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 wireless-next 2/9] carl9170: remove unnecessary (void*) conversions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <902e29df-785c-b194-44a9-72d1691813dd@nfschina.com>
Date:   Fri, 22 Sep 2023 09:33:52 +0800
From:   yunchuan <yunchuan@...china.com>
To:     Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@...il.com>, kvalo@...nel.org
Cc:     linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 wireless-next 2/9] carl9170: remove unnecessary (void*)
 conversions

Hi, Christian

On 2023/9/21 03:00, Christian Lamparter wrote:

> On 9/19/23 06:49, Wu Yunchuan wrote:
>> No need cast (void *) to (struct ar9170 *), (u8 *) or (void*).
>
> hmm, your mail went into the spam folder. Good thing I checked.
>
Sometimes mail didn't work :(.
> From what I remember: The reason why these casts were added in
> carl9170 was because of compiler warnings/complaints.
> Current gcc compilers should be OK (given that the kernel-bot
> didn't react, or went your Mail to their spam-folder as well?)
> but have you checked these older versions?
>
My gcc version is 10.2.1. And this seems work when gcc version is 
5.4(ubuntu 16.04) or 4.84(Ubuntu 14.04）.
I can't  compile Linux under Ubuntu 16.04 because of some compatibility 
problems.

So I test a simple demo like this:


void *p_void = NULL;
long var_long = 5;
long *p_long = &var_long;
p_void = p_long;

This works fine.

> (In 6.5.0 Documentation/admin-guide/README.rst states that one
> should have at least gcc 5.1 - could you run with those and
> see if C=2 W=1 passes?)
Oh, I want to do this, but I can't compile or install gcc 5.1 in my 
computer.
There are some compatibility problems. I hope I can deal this problem 
next week.

Wu Yunchan

>
> Regards,
> Christian
>
>> Signed-off-by: Wu Yunchuan <yunchuan@...china.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/net/wireless/ath/carl9170/usb.c | 10 +++++-----
>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/carl9170/usb.c 
>> b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/carl9170/usb.c
>> index e4eb666c6eea..c4edf8355941 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/carl9170/usb.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/carl9170/usb.c
>> @@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ static void carl9170_usb_tx_data_complete(struct 
>> urb *urb)
>>       switch (urb->status) {
>>       /* everything is fine */
>>       case 0:
>> -        carl9170_tx_callback(ar, (void *)urb->context);
>> +        carl9170_tx_callback(ar, urb->context);
>>           break;
>>         /* disconnect */
>> @@ -369,7 +369,7 @@ void carl9170_usb_handle_tx_err(struct ar9170 *ar)
>>       struct urb *urb;
>>         while ((urb = usb_get_from_anchor(&ar->tx_err))) {
>> -        struct sk_buff *skb = (void *)urb->context;
>> +        struct sk_buff *skb = urb->context;
>>             carl9170_tx_drop(ar, skb);
>>           carl9170_tx_callback(ar, skb);
>> @@ -397,7 +397,7 @@ static void carl9170_usb_tasklet(struct 
>> tasklet_struct *t)
>>     static void carl9170_usb_rx_complete(struct urb *urb)
>>   {
>> -    struct ar9170 *ar = (struct ar9170 *)urb->context;
>> +    struct ar9170 *ar = urb->context;
>>       int err;
>>         if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!ar))
>> @@ -559,7 +559,7 @@ static int carl9170_usb_flush(struct ar9170 *ar)
>>       int ret, err = 0;
>>         while ((urb = usb_get_from_anchor(&ar->tx_wait))) {
>> -        struct sk_buff *skb = (void *)urb->context;
>> +        struct sk_buff *skb = urb->context;
>>           carl9170_tx_drop(ar, skb);
>>           carl9170_tx_callback(ar, skb);
>>           usb_free_urb(urb);
>> @@ -668,7 +668,7 @@ int carl9170_exec_cmd(struct ar9170 *ar, const 
>> enum carl9170_cmd_oids cmd,
>>           memcpy(ar->cmd.data, payload, plen);
>>         spin_lock_bh(&ar->cmd_lock);
>> -    ar->readbuf = (u8 *)out;
>> +    ar->readbuf = out;
>>       ar->readlen = outlen;
>>       spin_unlock_bh(&ar->cmd_lock);
>