linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] blk-mq: support batched queue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZQ1SANMNrEK80lbN@fedora>
Date:   Fri, 22 Sep 2023 16:36:16 +0800
From:   Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
To:     chengming.zhou@...ux.dev
Cc:     axboe@...nel.dk, hch@....de, bvanassche@....org, kbusch@...nel.org,
        mst@...hat.com, damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] blk-mq: support batched queue_rqs() on shared
 tags queue

On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 03:16:14PM +0000, chengming.zhou@...ux.dev wrote:
> From: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
> 
> Since active requests have been accounted when allocate driver tags,
> we can remove this limit now.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
> ---
>  block/blk-mq.c | 7 +------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index c209a7dddee3..68ce9357463b 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -2781,13 +2781,8 @@ void blk_mq_flush_plug_list(struct blk_plug *plug, bool from_schedule)
>  		 * If we do, we can dispatch the whole plug list in one go. We
>  		 * already know at this point that all requests belong to the
>  		 * same queue, caller must ensure that's the case.
> -		 *
> -		 * Since we pass off the full list to the driver at this point,
> -		 * we do not increment the active request count for the queue.
> -		 * Bypass shared tags for now because of that.
>  		 */
> -		if (q->mq_ops->queue_rqs &&
> -		    !(rq->mq_hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_TAG_QUEUE_SHARED)) {
> +		if (q->mq_ops->queue_rqs) {
>  			blk_mq_run_dispatch_ops(q,
>  				__blk_mq_flush_plug_list(q, plug));
>  			if (rq_list_empty(plug->mq_list))

Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>

Thanks,
Ming