linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 01/17] iommu: Add hwpt_type with user_data for domain_alloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 22 Sep 2023 10:47:32 +0100
From:   Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
        Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@...el.com>, joro@...tes.org,
        alex.williamson@...hat.com, kevin.tian@...el.com,
        cohuck@...hat.com, eric.auger@...hat.com, nicolinc@...dia.com,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com,
        chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com, yi.y.sun@...ux.intel.com,
        peterx@...hat.com, jasowang@...hat.com,
        shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com, lulu@...hat.com,
        suravee.suthikulpanit@....com, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        zhenzhong.duan@...el.com, joao.m.martins@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/17] iommu: Add hwpt_type with user_data for
 domain_alloc_user op

On 2023-09-21 17:44, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 08:12:03PM +0800, Baolu Lu wrote:
>> On 2023/9/21 15:51, Yi Liu wrote:
>>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/iommufd.h b/include/uapi/linux/iommufd.h
>>> index 4a7c5c8fdbb4..3c8660fe9bb1 100644
>>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/iommufd.h
>>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/iommufd.h
>>> @@ -357,6 +357,14 @@ enum iommufd_hwpt_alloc_flags {
>>>    	IOMMU_HWPT_ALLOC_NEST_PARENT = 1 << 0,
>>>    };
>>> +/**
>>> + * enum iommu_hwpt_type - IOMMU HWPT Type
>>> + * @IOMMU_HWPT_TYPE_DEFAULT: default
>>
>> How about s/default/vendor agnostic/ ?
> 
> Please don't use the word vendor :)
> 
> IOMMU_HWPT_TYPE_GENERIC perhaps if we don't like default

Ah yes, a default domain type, not to be confused with any default 
domain type, including the default default domain type. Just in case 
anyone had forgotten how gleefully fun this is :D

I particularly like the bit where we end up with this construct later:

	switch (hwpt_type) {
	case IOMMU_HWPT_TYPE_DEFAULT:
		/* allocate a domain */
	default:
		/* allocate a different domain */
	}

But of course neither case allocates a *default* domain, because it's 
quite obviously the wrong place to be doing that.

I could go on enjoying myself, but basically yeah, "default" can't be a 
type in itself (at best it would be a meta-type which could be 
requested, such that it resolves to some real type to actually 
allocate), so a good name should reflect what the type functionally 
*means* to the user. IIUC the important distinction is that it's an 
abstract kernel-owned pagetable for the user to indirectly control via 
the API, rather than one it owns and writes directly (and thus has to be 
in a specific agreed format).

Thanks,
Robin.