[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230922103659.GCZQ1uS2VOlG82DVAs@fat_crate.local>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2023 12:36:59 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [tip: x86/cpu] x86/cpu: Clear SVM feature if disabled by BIOS
On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 12:26:09PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> It's a bit sad that we are duplicating identical code.
>
> 2)
>
> We are doing it in other cases as well: for example nearby_node() is
> duplicated between arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c and
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/hygon.c too.
We could do a unification pass at some point. At the moment is not worth
the effort, IMO, for only a handful of small functions.
> BTW., while look at this code I noticed that the 'Author' copyright
> tag in arch/x86/kernel/cpu/hygon.c seems to be inaccurate:
>
> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> /*
> * Hygon Processor Support for Linux
> *
> * Copyright (C) 2018 Chengdu Haiguang IC Design Co., Ltd.
> *
> * Author: Pu Wen <puwen@...on.cn>
> */
>
> ... as for example the nearby_node() was clearly copied & derived from
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c, which does not appear to be accurately reflected
> in this copyright notice?
Perhaps it should say "copied from amd.c and adjusted" or so. That whole
file has pretty-much copied parts of amd.c AFAICT.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists