lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230922134739.6f55f46d@wsk>
Date:   Fri, 22 Sep 2023 13:47:39 +0200
From:   Lukasz Majewski <lukma@...x.de>
To:     Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc:     Tristram.Ha@...rochip.com, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, davem@...emloft.net,
        Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@...rochip.com>,
        Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 net-next 0/5] net: dsa: hsr: Enable HSR HW offloading
 for KSZ9477

Hi Vladimir,

> On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 01:18:38PM +0200, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> > By mistake my net-next repo was pointing to:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net
> > 
> > Please correct me if I'm wrong but it looks like the net repo for
> > current mainline fixes...  
> 
> Yes, net.git is for fixes to the current mainline branch, and net-next
> is for new features to be included in mainline during the next merge
> window. They are the same at the beginning of the development cycle
> and then they start to diverge.
> 
> > However, after fetching net-next - I can apply v5 without issues on
> > top of it.
> > 
> > SHA1: 5a1b322cb0b7d0d33a2d13462294dc0f46911172
> > "Merge branch 'mlxsw-multicast'"
> > 
> > https://source.denx.de/linux/linux-ksz9477/-/commits/net-next-ksz-HSR-devel-v5?ref_type=heads
> > Linux version from `uname -a`: 6.6.0-rc2+
> > 
> > However, it looks like I would need to prepare v6 anyway...  
> 
> I don't know. "git rebase" is a bit smarter than "git am" and can
> automatically resolve some conflicts, on which "git am" will simply
> bail out if even the context is not identical. Either way, both
> patchwork and me failed to apply your v5 series on net-next, and the
> patches won't be accepted without build testing.

Ok. I will test them with git am -3


Best regards,

Lukasz Majewski

--

DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Erika Unter
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-59 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: lukma@...x.de

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ