[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230922-halunken-teilweise-b118ac91eeb1@brauner>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2023 14:28:24 +0200
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL v2] timestamp fixes
> I'll have to think about it. The first step is to get all of the
I think it'd be best if we start off with converting the other times in
struct inode to accessor and leave the questions whether timestamps-
until-2292 are enough to solve for later. I don't think the torn
timestamp reads is all that of a pressing issue and mixing both things
up might just stall what is otherwise already a worthy cleanup.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists