lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 22 Sep 2023 11:47:36 +0800
From:   Xin Liu <liuxin350@...wei.com>
To:     <ast@...nel.org>, <daniel@...earbox.net>, <andrii@...nel.org>,
        <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, <song@...nel.org>, <yhs@...com>,
        <john.fastabend@...il.com>, <kpsingh@...nel.org>, <sdf@...gle.com>,
        <haoluo@...gle.com>, <jolsa@...nel.org>
CC:     <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <yanan@...wei.com>, <wuchangye@...wei.com>,
        <xiesongyang@...wei.com>, <kongweibin2@...wei.com>,
        <liuxin350@...wei.com>, <tianmuyang@...wei.com>
Subject: The kernel fails to load the ko file because the btf information in the ko file is inconsistent.

Hi all:

We've had a confusing problem recently. The kfunc is used in the ko and
kfunc is registered when the ko is loaded. Even if the code is not
modified, the ko compiled at different times cannot register kfunc
success on the kernel. It seems that the inconsistency of btf id causes
this problem.

Is there any way we can solve this problem at the moment?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ