[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230922151651.GA437346@hu-bjorande-lv.qualcomm.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2023 08:16:51 -0700
From: Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@...cinc.com>
To: Om Prakash Singh <quic_omprsing@...cinc.com>
CC: <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
<agross@...nel.org>, <andersson@...nel.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
<davem@...emloft.net>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
<robh+dt@...nel.org>, <vkoul@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] crypto: qcom-rng - Add hw_random interface support
On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 08:34:08AM +0530, Om Prakash Singh wrote:
> Add hw_random interface support in qcom-rng driver as new IP block
> in Qualcomm SoC has inbuilt NIST SP800 90B compliant entropic source
> to generate true random number.
>
> Keeping current rng_alg interface as well for random number generation
> using Kernel Crypto API.
>
> Signed-off-by: Om Prakash Singh <quic_omprsing@...cinc.com>
> ---
>
> Changes in V2:
> - Updated patch to fix the return value from qcom_rng_generate() to be
> consistent with current implementation
As far as I can tell you didn't change this, see below.
> - Updated patch to make it more concise
> - Removed unnecessary use local variable and it's initialization
> - Updated patch to use devm_hwrng_register() instead of hwrng_register()
> - Updated subject line of the patch
>
> This patch is depends on [1]
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230824-topic-sm8550-rng-v2-4-dfcafbb16a3e@linaro.org/
>
> drivers/crypto/qcom-rng.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/qcom-rng.c b/drivers/crypto/qcom-rng.c
> index fb54b8cfc35f..e5a574a3cc59 100644
> --- a/drivers/crypto/qcom-rng.c
> +++ b/drivers/crypto/qcom-rng.c
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
> #include <linux/acpi.h>
> #include <linux/clk.h>
> #include <linux/crypto.h>
> +#include <linux/hw_random.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> #include <linux/iopoll.h>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> @@ -32,13 +33,18 @@ struct qcom_rng {
> struct mutex lock;
> void __iomem *base;
> struct clk *clk;
> - unsigned int skip_init;
> + struct qcom_rng_of_data *of_data;
> };
>
> struct qcom_rng_ctx {
> struct qcom_rng *rng;
> };
>
> +struct qcom_rng_of_data {
> + bool skip_init;
> + bool hwrng_support;
> +};
> +
> static struct qcom_rng *qcom_rng_dev;
>
> static int qcom_rng_read(struct qcom_rng *rng, u8 *data, unsigned int max)
> @@ -70,7 +76,7 @@ static int qcom_rng_read(struct qcom_rng *rng, u8 *data, unsigned int max)
> }
> } while (currsize < max);
>
> - return 0;
> + return currsize;
As I pointed out in my previous review, if the qcom_rng_read() is
requested to read a number of bytes (max) that is not evenly divisible
with 4 (WORD_SZ) the loop will exit without accounting for the last
bytes copied...
> }
>
> static int qcom_rng_generate(struct crypto_rng *tfm,
> @@ -92,6 +98,9 @@ static int qcom_rng_generate(struct crypto_rng *tfm,
> mutex_unlock(&rng->lock);
> clk_disable_unprepare(rng->clk);
>
> + if (ret == dlen)
...this means that if dlen % 4, you're changing the return value of this
function from 0 to dlen.
> + ret = 0;
> +
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -101,6 +110,13 @@ static int qcom_rng_seed(struct crypto_rng *tfm, const u8 *seed,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int qcom_hwrng_read(struct hwrng *rng, void *data, size_t max, bool wait)
> +{
> + struct qcom_rng *qrng = (struct qcom_rng *)rng->priv;
You missed Herbert's request in [1], which I presume implies that
qcom_hwrng should be moved into struct qcom_rng, which would mean that
you can get the qrng by container_of().
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZQQvlXvGy8p01uJS@gondor.apana.org.au/
> +
> + return qcom_rng_read(qrng, data, max);
> +}
> +
> static int qcom_rng_enable(struct qcom_rng *rng)
> {
> u32 val;
> @@ -136,7 +152,7 @@ static int qcom_rng_init(struct crypto_tfm *tfm)
>
> ctx->rng = qcom_rng_dev;
>
> - if (!ctx->rng->skip_init)
> + if (!ctx->rng->of_data->skip_init)
> return qcom_rng_enable(ctx->rng);
>
> return 0;
> @@ -157,6 +173,12 @@ static struct rng_alg qcom_rng_alg = {
> }
> };
>
> +static struct hwrng qcom_hwrng = {
> + .name = "qcom-hwrng",
> + .read = qcom_hwrng_read,
> + .quality = 1024,
> +};
Which would mean not adding this static global variable...
Regards,
Bjorn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists