linux-kernel - [PATCH v11 32/37] x86/entry/calling: Allow PUSH_AND_CLEAR

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230923094212.26520-33-xin3.li@intel.com>
Date:   Sat, 23 Sep 2023 02:42:07 -0700
From:   Xin Li <xin3.li@...el.com>
To:     linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org
Cc:     tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
        dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
        luto@...nel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com, seanjc@...gle.com,
        peterz@...radead.org, jgross@...e.com, ravi.v.shankar@...el.com,
        mhiramat@...nel.org, andrew.cooper3@...rix.com,
        jiangshanlai@...il.com, nik.borisov@...e.com
Subject: [PATCH v11 32/37] x86/entry/calling: Allow PUSH_AND_CLEAR_REGS being used beyond actual entry code

From: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>

PUSH_AND_CLEAR_REGS could be used besides actual entry code; in that case
%rbp shouldn't be cleared (otherwise the frame pointer is destroyed) and
UNWIND_HINT shouldn't be added.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Tested-by: Shan Kang <shan.kang@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Xin Li <xin3.li@...el.com>
---
 arch/x86/entry/calling.h | 15 ++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/calling.h b/arch/x86/entry/calling.h
index f6907627172b..eb57c023d5df 100644
--- a/arch/x86/entry/calling.h
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/calling.h
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ For 32-bit we have the following conventions - kernel is built with
  * for assembly code:
  */
 
-.macro PUSH_REGS rdx=%rdx rcx=%rcx rax=%rax save_ret=0
+.macro PUSH_REGS rdx=%rdx rcx=%rcx rax=%rax save_ret=0 unwind_hint=1
 	.if \save_ret
 	pushq	%rsi		/* pt_regs->si */
 	movq	8(%rsp), %rsi	/* temporarily store the return address in %rsi */
@@ -87,14 +87,17 @@ For 32-bit we have the following conventions - kernel is built with
 	pushq	%r13		/* pt_regs->r13 */
 	pushq	%r14		/* pt_regs->r14 */
 	pushq	%r15		/* pt_regs->r15 */
+
+	.if \unwind_hint
 	UNWIND_HINT_REGS
+	.endif
 
 	.if \save_ret
 	pushq	%rsi		/* return address on top of stack */
 	.endif
 .endm
 
-.macro CLEAR_REGS
+.macro CLEAR_REGS clear_bp=1
 	/*
 	 * Sanitize registers of values that a speculation attack might
 	 * otherwise want to exploit. The lower registers are likely clobbered
@@ -109,7 +112,9 @@ For 32-bit we have the following conventions - kernel is built with
 	xorl	%r10d, %r10d	/* nospec r10 */
 	xorl	%r11d, %r11d	/* nospec r11 */
 	xorl	%ebx,  %ebx	/* nospec rbx */
+	.if \clear_bp
 	xorl	%ebp,  %ebp	/* nospec rbp */
+	.endif
 	xorl	%r12d, %r12d	/* nospec r12 */
 	xorl	%r13d, %r13d	/* nospec r13 */
 	xorl	%r14d, %r14d	/* nospec r14 */
@@ -117,9 +122,9 @@ For 32-bit we have the following conventions - kernel is built with
 
 .endm
 
-.macro PUSH_AND_CLEAR_REGS rdx=%rdx rcx=%rcx rax=%rax save_ret=0
-	PUSH_REGS rdx=\rdx, rcx=\rcx, rax=\rax, save_ret=\save_ret
-	CLEAR_REGS
+.macro PUSH_AND_CLEAR_REGS rdx=%rdx rcx=%rcx rax=%rax save_ret=0 clear_bp=1 unwind_hint=1
+	PUSH_REGS rdx=\rdx, rcx=\rcx, rax=\rax, save_ret=\save_ret unwind_hint=\unwind_hint
+	CLEAR_REGS clear_bp=\clear_bp
 .endm
 
 .macro POP_REGS pop_rdi=1
-- 
2.34.1